Skip to content

Dillard: Extravagant Gesture

October 8, 2016
Tinker Creek

Tinker Creek

You might remember that Thoreau concludes Walden with a meditation on the word extravagant: fearing that his expression may not be extravagant enough, reminding readers that extra/vagance connotes wandering without. And thus the cow who jumps the fence is more extravagant than the wild buffalo, in Thoreau’s view.  Such extravagance, then, is not at odds with his emphasis on simple living–or it is only ironically so: explore your neighborhood that is also the world.

Annie Dillard inherits this imperative from Thoreau and, it seems to me, puts it to work in Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. “I am no scientist,” she writes; “I explore the neighborhood.” Dillard’s neighborhood is Tinker Creek in western Virginia, near Roanoke and Blacksburg. One of the confluences of Walden and Tinker Creek that I have been tracking and want to meditate further with you, is the appearance of the word extravagant and its variations in her book. By my accounting, no less than 10 times. I can’t say all that it means for her, why she views nature as extravagant–this is a question you might take up as you read as well. However, I can say that there is a connection between her vision of nature’s extravagance, so fervently described in the book, and the stylistic vision of her writing. Her writing, one could say, is appropriately extravagant.

In matters of style, it might be more helpful to say that her style is exuberant–or more familiar to describe her writing and her vision and even her personality in terms of exuberance. Several images come to mind from the archive of Dillard memories that I have and (still) bring to her books when I read her. The first: her essay (collected in Teaching a Stone to Talk) titled “Living Like Weasels.” She describes an encounter with a weasel (think Thoreau and his woodchuck?) in which she locks eyes and meditates exuberantly, extravagantly, on the weasels wonderful instinct for this kind of fixed attention. The essay, wonderfully brief and fixed in its attention (and, as we often get with Dillard, equally humorous and serious) becomes its own demonstration. She is writing like a weasel. The second image of exuberance: a teacher of mine described Dillard’s presence at a reading she had gone to; Dillard, a notorious chain smoker and fiendish coffee drinker–apparently doing both during the reading. We can feel such exuberance even in her lines–and in fact, in her book The Writing Life, she describes such habits of writing. She  writes about the act of writing being a practice of spending all that one has, nothing to be saved for later. A third image of this notion of spending one’s passion comes from her autobiography, An American Childhood. Among the many scenes where we see this lesson of exuberance from her childhood, one stands out to me. She describes an incident where she and a group of friends are caught throwing snowballs at a passing car. The driver chases them wildly on foot for what seems like miles. She absolutely loves the extravagance of this act–a man in a suit chasing kids madly through the snow. For her, it is an act of passion, an act of exuberance without regard to an end.

I am not sure, entirely, where to go with this. Again, a question I will be asking, and perhaps asking us to try to make some sense of before we leave Dillard behind. But for now, notice the etymology of exuberance (borrowed from wiktionary): From Latin exuberare (“‘to grow thickly, to abound’”); from ex (“‘out’”), and uber (“‘udder’”), and originally would have referred to a cow or she-goat which was making so much milk that it naturally dripped or sprayed from the udder.

This brings Thoreau’s cow back into view. Extravagance, as he writes, is a question of how one is yarded. There is something of Dillard’s nature here as well: its exuberance located in a familiar place, if only we would see it.

And so, exuberance or extravagance as beauty in the familiar landscape, in what’s around us. Such as a flock of starlings; the beauty of unexpectedness, as she calls it. But also, the extravagance of mystery and violence in nature’s darker narrative of life–the horrible nature movie, she also refers to and has ever in mind. The giant water bug from the opening pages, that leads to the question for us: What do we think of the created universe?

Further reading:

Note how Dillard and her giant water bug come up in this recent discussion of Nature and its bad behaviors.

More and starlings and “murmuration” (Dillard observes this in chapter 3).

The Wikipedia entry on Pilgrim and Dillard is very thorough (no pun intended).

3 Comments leave one →
  1. August 1, 2013 9:35 am

    It’s amazing to pay a quick visit this website and reading the views of all colleagues regarding this piece of writing, while I am also zealous of getting familiarity.

  2. July 3, 2013 10:39 pm

    great issues altogether, you just gained a logo new reader.
    What would you recommend about your submit that you made a few days ago?
    Any positive?

  3. June 25, 2013 1:59 pm

    Hi there mates, nice post and pleasant arguments commented here,
    I am truly enjoying by these.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: